Issue - meetings
Three Rivers House Solar Panels Array Extension
Meeting: 08/09/2025 - Policy and Resources Committee (Item 5)
5 Three Rivers House Solar Panels Array Extension
PDF 280 KB
That:
Policy and Resources Committee instruct officers to install the proposed PV Solar Array on Three Rivers House, to be installed by Chiltern Solar who were the successful bidder from the competitive tender process.
The Policy & Resources Committee provide delegated authority to the Assistant Director For Environment to appoint the recommended solar PV installer at a cost of £50,813 (excl. VAT).
Additional documents:
- Appendix 1 for Three Rivers House Outline Business Case for Solar Panel Addition, item 5
PDF 543 KB
- Appendix 2 Three Rivers House Solar Panel EIA, item 5
PDF 426 KB
- Appendix 3 CCSIA for TRH Solar Panel Array Extension, item 5
PDF 170 KB
- appendix 4 Sustainability Finance Pro Forma TRH Solar Panel Addition, item 5
PDF 65 KB
Minutes:
The Committee considered reports on the installation of solar PV arrays at both Three Rivers House and South Oxhey Leisure Centre. Officers reported that the capital budget for net zero projects had been ring fenced and competitive tenders had been received. For Three Rivers House, Chiltern Solar was the recommended installer at a cost of £50, 813 (Excluding VAT) with a payback period of 7.4 years.
For South Oxhey Leisure Centre, the recommended scheme was larger (145kw) at a cost of £102,902 (Excluding VAT) with a payback period of 4.9 years. Electricity would be sold to the leisure operator under the terms of contract.
Members expressed strong support for both schemes, noting their contribution to sustainability objectives and the financial case. Questions were raised on cost assumptions, payback periods, and future proofing in light of local government reorganization. Officers confirmed that multiple bids had validated the costings and that future occupancy of Three Rivers House was secure. Issues relating to possible government grant support were discussed. Concerns about the wider cost of energy and use of public funds were noted.
The motion was put to the vote and was carried unanimously.